If you've ever had the misfortune to spend much time with CRM gurus or 'data driven marketing specialists' you'll be familiar with the terms 'aquisition' 'conversion' and 'retention'.

It all feels a little uncomfortable doesn't it? In some parts like some sort of aggressive corporate raider from the 1980's bent on acquiring companies and then stripping their assets for a killing.

Gordon-gekko

In others, a little like Scientologists, or other disquieting cults looking to convert and retain acolytes.

Tom_cruise_718932491

It's also anathema for anyone who's spent any time looking at how marketing and brands really work.

No brand 'aquires' 'converts' or 'retains' enough people for sustained sales growth.

Few care about brands nearly enough for that level of cut and dried shifts in a relationship, as of course, it's not really a relationship, more just one a few vague aquaintances. 

This is where the 'cult' metaphor is of more use, since the only people that care that much are slightly wierd 'cult like' fans of the brand.

Not only are they a big minority, in terms of numbers and sales value, they would have bought anyway, whatever the clever email marketing campaign and digital measuring doo-dahs. Most CRM stuff simply measures a sale that would, most likely, have happened in any case.

A better use of words to describe interactions with brands would be:

'Get noticed at all'

'Create sort of weak habit'

'Try and stay fresh and interesting to stop that weak habit getting even more weak'.

When any kind marketing guru uses words best kept to cultish charlatans selling you moonshine, you can probably assume that's is exactly what they are really offering. 

Posted in

3 responses to “Why words like aquisition and retention or moonshine”

  1. Martin Avatar

    Have you noticed how the more people gush about ‘big data’ the less they’re familiar with the small data. Like how people buy brands?

    Like

  2. Northern Avatar
    Northern

    Like the little boy said in the Sixth Sense, all the time.
    Mr Twain’s hammers and nails spring to mind

    Like

  3. Tofan Avatar
    Tofan

    It’s like what Abraham Maslow said “When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail”. Having worked in CRM agency before (I work at advertising agency now), it seems to me that what a brand needs is actually a positive recognition in order to drive profits instead of focusing solely on handful of so-called “high value” people. Not that I’m saying CRM is bad though; it’s just that we all need to see the situation case by case, instead of jumping the gun and say “we must acquire people & do retention campaign”. Not every brand needs CRM

    Like

Leave a comment