I know a little about golf as a sport,I even play (very badly) occasionally – more of a social thing than an attempt at sporting glory, but I do know a fair bit about sport.
I'll never understand thought why someone, obviously some sort of brand doesn't explode the conventions of the sport. If you ask most young people what they think of golf they'd probably say, 'Boring' 'Elitist' 'Slow' 'Middle class' 'Old fashioned' 'For the country club' and 'not for someone like me'.
I know of course that cost of Golf makes it elitist, and brands make a fortune out of well off, paunchy men spending hundreds on equipment, not to mention the daft clothes – but imagine the volume out there with younger males.
Imagine if someone could make Golf cool? Like Nike did for tennis (trust me, in those days this was cool):
And there's still stuff like this….
Not forgetting the women….
Tennis was incredibly popular in the late seventies/early eighties. This tie-break did more for the game than anything else (1980)….
But it wasn't cool. It took some personalities and great communications ideas to make it thus.
Why doesn't someone do that for Golf? Why not champion a version of Golf that's inspiring? Why not champion a personality who people can identify with? And go beyond mere branding and DO stuff – authentically bring Golf to as many people as possible. In short, in authoritarian, conservative sport why not rebel?
Leave a reply to Rob Mortimer Cancel reply