Nick Southgate thinks most planning blogs are useless. His main argument (I think) is that most share opinions rather than actual fact, which is fair enough but that's actually what I find most valuable as a writer of one and a reader of others.
Facts are my day job, actually that's not true, it's making facts compelling. Facts are easy, great facts are less so, making them compelling bit is bloody hard. That requires imagination and inspiration – blogs are good for that.
One way of working is to get an opinion fast and then test it to destruction – you need a good start, something to get you looking somewhere…so blogs that share good opinions are useful in my book.
The problem is when readers assume what it written is gospel. There are a few blogs that pretend to be The One Truth, that's not healthy, but most are just venturing an opinion and working things out in public. That's good, as long you take them that way.
Leave a reply to tom Cancel reply