• If you haven’t seen this film, hire the DVD, buy it, you need to see it. Too many reasons to go into, the acting, the taught script, the way Havier Bardem manages to become a human Terminator – you believe he can’t be stopped.

    But the thing that most grabs me about this film is the way it works after you’ve seen it. It’s enthralling to be sure, but it finishes and then a little later you start thinking, then a little more..and you cannot stop going back over the film, getting more depth, making more links. It just gets better the longer it is since you watched it. Is that an example of deceptive cadence?

    Now consider ads and stuff, how they have to compete with popular culture now they cannot interupt. How many ads make you want to think and discuss like that?

  • Someone I know was the last boyfriend of a lovely girl who came out a month after dumping him. Made him question himself.

    Not in that league this, two agencies I used to work at are on the ropes. The first has a credit crunched bank as the biggest client, the second basically mis-managed itself into a fire sale and finally liquidated a year or so after. I’m crossing my fingers for other past employers.

    Joking aside, I’m not sure how I feel about the one that has just been forced to close it’s doors. I had a mixed time there. Some great memories of some good people are mixed with some less cherished ones. One one hand, the recent news is laced with subtle trace of Schadenfreude (can’t be arsed to spell check that).

    But then, this was a lot of people with jobs, debts and families. And the place had a once proud history, I learned a lot there too. I’m where I am now because of bad things there as well as good. Hard to complain at that.

    I’m not sure how to feel. Sad though.

    1. The front cover of The Daily Sport has become less pervy and more cheeky. It looks more like the Daily Star.
    2. Professionals on whom sometimes depend are getting younger than me- this is not a good thing.
    3. The soundtrack to conferences has become the gentle tap of wireless laptops.
    4. People with just one big project on have little conception that others have something else on too.
    5. When you cook most of your own stuff, everthing else tastes of salt.
    6. When you play a song you love to someone else, you hear it though their ears.
    7. Social networking follows the natural pattern of proper friends. You wake up one day and find you’ve lost touch with a whole bunch of people through natural selection.
    8. You cannot have an intimate conversation in Wagamama.
    9. Only olympic athletes can get away with proper running shorts.
    10. People who grew up together (males) create an impenetrable web of in-jokes and dialect that an outsider can never hope to penetrate.
    11. House parties for people in their mid-thirties always break into splinter groups formed around those who want to talk about children and those that don’t.
    12. Good creatives either come up with brilliant ideas or useless ones. Great creatives either come up brilliance, or something usable.
  • Before I go on, brand essences, visions, positionings, onions, ladders and God knows what have their place. Sometimes you need a box full of ticks to give you a common frame of reference with clients, especially at board level. There, I’ve said. But you’ll find it hard to get something interesting enough for today’s mediascape if you stop there.

    That goes for tone of voice too. This is an old rant, but the embers are still warm. More than once, I’ve been furnished with a hallowed huge tone of voice document from some brand consultancy,expected use it to inform the verbal and non-verbal bits of creative work. In other words, take the useless thing the ones a galaxy away from the creative did and make it relevant for the poor sods who have to actually execute something.

    Now, to the bit I want to talk about. If you haven’t read Faris’ thesis on transmedia thinking, you should. If you still can’t be bothered (shame on you) simply consider that brand communication needs to be both complex and coherent accross a myriad of media, for a myriad of audience groups, who will mould the story in their own way, and talk to different people about in in different levels. That’s life I’m afraid.

    And don’t scoff, that’s how  popular culture is going. The Star Wars films my have ended, but there’s a cartoon spin off coming this summer, and the next ”game’ is actually another prequel instalment in its own right, with a conclusion that turns the series on its head. Of course, you can stick with the films if you like, or maybe read a couple of books, or you may have read some of the comics as a kid – engage as much as you like. Not to mention the compexity of Lost, The Dr Who spin off series’ or even how you’ll neverf truly get Donnie Darko without some time on the website.

    It’s not as hard or incoherent as it looks. George Lucas has a back story for Star Wars long before he wrote the first script. Jk Rowling had a core Potter timeline in place well before the first book. Tolkien created language and mythology for his world long before he wrote the Hobbit…depth, history….back story.

    That’s starts with a film pitch quality for brands…something concise, but rich enough for lots of sub-plots (evolving tactical objectives), character arcs (different reaons to enage for different fans) and spin offs (brand extensions). Like Buffy’s ‘horror in high school’ the X-Files ‘paranormal FBI departement, the Bourne films ‘Crack assassin with amnesia’ and of course, the great Heroes ‘People with superpowers but not in comic book land’.

    Write a back story first, look for the story arc, then look to compress it. As long as you know it’s generous enough for lots of episodes/chapters, it makes planning for brands at once consistent and liberating. It becomes, "Where should the story go now, based on what we know we need to achieve".

    It’s only one way of doing it, but it seems to help me. Have a go, see what you think.

     

  • I took Mrs Northern to see Kylie in Manchester last night. She loved it, which is all that matters, but I couldn’t help but enjoy it.

    Not only was it a great show, there’s something about strength in numbers that makes shows like this really special. In spite of yourself, you can’t help the mirror neurons firing, smiling, clapping along and generally feeling like you belong. Brands don’t bring their tribes together enough in my view.

    More people in agencies should go see performances like last night because:

    1. They show how to present to a crowd. I didn’t see the lyrics behind her as she sung, like you do with most powerpoint presentations. The visuals, films and lights were a backdrop that added to songs, made them more powerful. That’s how to present.

    2. Kylie was shamelessly populist when she started singing, then tried to go cool, grungy and even indie. Didn’t work. No one wanted a grungy Kylie, it wasn’t her ‘thing’, they wanted a little pop princess Kylie. That’s when she came back in from the cold…cacatchy pop songs with a added dollop of sexiness and genuine innovation in her shows. That’s her thing, that what she does best.

    That’s a lesson for agencies, who are prone to making their work what they want it to be, rather than what the brand’s fans do. And it’s a lesson for clients, who are often guilty of wanting their brand to be something it’s not.Kylie’s no Joni Mitchell, but what she does, she does well, and her public loves it.

    Which brings me to Orange’s new ‘"I am" work. It’s taken a pasting in the trade, but I bet it’s working. It’s a truth for a start, we’re all shaped by how we interact with others (last night showed that). But also, the people I’ve spoken to who don’t live in an advertising bubble think it’s really nice, gives them  warm glow and makes them ‘like’ Orange. Attention? Tick. Involvement? Tick. Salience? Tick. Talkabilty? Tick again.

    I hate those Halifix ads with the staff. You talk to their customers, it’s like catnip. We’re here to suprise and delight THEM not us, our creative directors or Claire Beale.   

  • Good: The Famous David Mortimer is joining my planning department on a placement, and maybe even his first job once he shows what he can do. Also, he’s get to try my tea, a Damascene experience if ever there was one.

    Mortfoliotest8type2

    Bad: Once he shows his skills he’ll expose us older charlatans and I’ll probably me out on my ear.

  • Like I’ve said before, we’re all good at something and we should respect and celebrate that, or in another way, those that do things we can’t, or don’t want to. When I worked on Morrisons I had to spend some time working a checkout and failed miserably, checkout people make it look very, very, easy. There’s a world tiddly winks champion, and good for him, he’s spent thousands of hours getting that good.

    Tiddlywinksmile

    This goes for agencies, where the culture seems to celebrate the big names, the thinkers and the ideas people. On one hand, take away the junior suits who organise the meetings for other people who have to be cajoled, bullied and coaxed into meeting rooms, who do the contact reports and oil the whole client relationship where it really matters, the bread and butter day to day. A background as a suit make’s me quite organised for a planner, but I pale next my ghd team, they love the jobs I hate and make it look so easy.

    100_2131

    Think about the real doers, traffic, the studio, the buildings manager, production, TV department…accounts who make sure we’re payed, dreaded HR who sort out pensions for us. No none talks about them, says thanks, or says hi enough.They should, without them we’d fall apart.

    When you start in an agency, make sure you get to know the junior suits, creatives and clients really well, they’re the ones that make things happen. But if you really want to know how a place works, if you really want to get things done, make friends with the real doers..traffic, productions, buildings managers and, of course, the receptionists and PA’s. These (usually girls) know EVERYTHING, and can do lots of little things for you..the battle for rooms, the battle for their masters’/mistress’ time, and lots of supposedly little things that matter a great deal.

    Here’s to the doers…ideas are nothing without them to see them through.

  • When I used to swim I was lucky to have a coach who forced us to refine constantly refine our strokes. it felt like being trapped in a mind clamp of boredom,  I just wanted to pelt up and down the pool…he had us doing endless drills, not to mention repeating tumble turns and the use of arm paddles that melted your muscles like warm Nutella. But he did me a big favour. One that applies to planning as well as swimming.

    Swimming20drills20for20every20strok

    I won races against bigger and stronger boys in the last few metres as their strokes fell apart. While strength and energy glossed over the, sometimes miniscule, flaws at the start, those little wrinkles in technique became too much. Strategy is a bit like that you know.

    Maybe you’ve written a brief that sings, full of drama and inspiration, there’s just a little nagging doubt,something just isn’t quite right. There’s the creative review where the work leaves you buzzing, but at the core, something doesn’t feel quite right, it’s nothing major, it’ll be fine, it’s interesting enough to gloss over that anyway.

    But like the boys with the slightly flawed strokes, the further you go, the louder those quiet little cracks sing. 

    Hopefully someone in the team will bring this up, but to be honest, you’re the planner, it’s your job to make sure the thinking’s water tight.

    100_0969

    Now imagine you’ve let it lie. You’re doing concept testing, the client’s there, whole team’s there, and it unravels. Or it gets to presentation to the board, and they rip your client to shreds.

    And who will get the kicking? You will. You’re the strategist, you should have pointed it out.

    A little patience at the level of the brief, or a little bit of unpopularity when you play the logic card at the review really is worth it in the end.