• Thinkingblogger

    Lauren tagged me ages ago, so it’s about time I got around to putting down five blogs that make me think. Now there are far more than five, and you all know who you are, so I’m going to choose some that give me a slightly different perspective on stuff…..

    1. Fake it until you make it. These are the observations of One Woman Running, an aspiring creative. I love the way she writes, I like her observations on The Work, but what I really enjoy is the way talks about her life. She makes me remember what it was like struggling to get that first job and how brave temps and people doing something they don’t love are – every single day.
    2. Regine Debatty (we make money not art). This is a new one for me, but I love it. It sits at the intersection between technology and art. She shows how artists are using their medium to expose the ethical questions we should be asking about what’s going in in labs right now. As a science geek I love it, as a planner who wants to know what the conversations about the future are, well ditto.
    3. Ray Kurzweil’s blog about emerging trends and technology can be quite scary sometimes, but always useful. The silliest thing I can do as a planner is just read stuff about planning. I think it’s important to hoard all sorts of interesting stuff. This is a great place to do just that.
    4. I have to put Lauren and her She Sees Red Blog. I don’t know enough about art, something I want to remedy. Lauren’s reporting on her gallery visits, and how she does her own work is really helpful and a joy to read. Lauren’s one of these people that doesn’t just talk, she does.
    5. So is James Boardwell. He’s someone I was lucky enough to meet at those Northern Planning summits. Now he helps me with most of my Web 2.0 stuff, and social research. His blog doesn’t get updated very much, which is a good job since lots of his stuff needs time for proper reflection. There’s lots of meaty posts about, well, everything. Every time I meet him he makes me think, for as long as I can keep up with him that is. He’s living proof that it’s essential to know people who are far cleverer than you are.
    6. And I’m going to be cheeky and add a sixth. Marcus Brown is an interesting, generous man. He’s on the third version of his own blog, which is beginning to sire some posts that are incredibly profound, honest, personal and beautifully written. Then there are his alter egos, The Dead Artist and Sacrum. Sacrum is very funny, but he’s also an intelligent comment on the way planning models are used to look clever while doing nothing useful whatsoever.

    By the way, Sacrum seems to have packed his bags and vanished into hiding at a secret       destination. Do you think he was responsible for the Olympic logo?

  • Ray Kurzweil’s ideas sound daft at first – but before you dismiss him, consider the following:

    In the the 1970’s he invented programmes to analyze patterns in composers music and make new scores in their own style.

    In 1984 he made the first electronic gizmo that could perfectly mimic acoustic instruments (Stevie Wonder suggested it).

    He’s one those technical doers that believes something will be useful and possible and – does it.

    Right now he thinks we’re only decades away from clever, conscious computers. Ones that will be able to demand rights and will probably be more intelligent than us. Now of course the problem with futurology is that it’s usually wrong, but look at Honda’s Asimo…machines and computers are already changing our lives, and the process is speeding up all the time. Think of the way mobile phones have truly revolutionised our social lives, or the way the internet has transformed information culture (and social lives too).

    Asimo_01

    You might be worried that with all these machines doing everything for us, we’ll get bored without the trials and tribulations of the daily grind, but just maybe culture is ready…

    Consider the emerging behavior of Baby Boomers – over 55’s have all that energy, all that time and all that money. Some (mostly male) try and replace the lost corporate status and usefulness – they try and hold on. But others are beginning to embrace this time of life as a new beginning, a chance to do all the things they wanted to try but never had the chance – in essence an experience culture based on self actualisation. They don’t want to be defined by age, but by attitude.

    Helen_mirren_web

    Anyway, imagine you were a mediaeval serf transported to 2007. Even a poor homeless person would be existing in the lap of luxury to them. Worrying about a home being repossessed isn’t quite the same as fleeing rape and pillage, or avoiding the Inquisition.

    Spanish_inquisition

    So maybe an answer to the question, "How will we stay interested?", would be, "Are you interested now?".

    Of course we know that in the 1960’s they were predicting that by now we’d all be enjoying unlimited leisure by by now. But it never happened. Economists have shown that consumerism and our booming living standards are not making us happier – we’re more glum than we were in 1950. That’s thanks to us working our socks off so we can get the latest stuff we don’t need, and then find we get bored with it quickly, so we need to work harder to get more. Maybe the Baby Boomers chasing experiences are showing us the way.There’s plenty of evidence around that we’re ALL craving more time now, with loved ones, but also for ourselves.

    And maybe more people will be able to do the kind of jobs that interest them, maybe we’ll have jobs that allow us to have flow – like the way you lose yourself in gardening, or a good game of chess.

    That said, after a 200 years decline of working hours, the 80’s saw a reverse – largely thanks to lack of job security. But we still spend more time on leisure too. For the first time, in 1999 we spent more on leisure than clothing, housing food or transport.

    So where do we get the time? You could argue that we spend less time with friends, but we also toil less over household chores. Technology has reduced drudgery, which we’ve filled with more work and more fun. But there’s a sting in that tail. Any more technology has a danger of being seen as drudgery too – another booklet to read, more settings to learn. More so than ever, innovations have to be useful and easy to use – take the work AND the thinking away from us. Think about it, our houses are already run by stupid robots – central heating, oven timers, answering machines, Sky Plus…….

    That serf looking at us now would think we’ve gone mad. There’s an intense pressure on us to make the most of our down time now. We watch crap reality shows guiltily, we lounge around in pools worried that we should be seeing an art gallery, or wandering through an old cathedral. We eat prepared meals guiltily thinking of unopened cook books.

    Maybe we’ll welcome these new machines with open arms, maybe we’re ready to enjoy our time, but you just wonder if leisure will turn into so much hard work…….

  • Progress is usually considered a good thing. Mostly it is, but sometimes it can be a double edged sword. Of course there’s the usual examples, like nuclear power, or the combustion engine, but maybe there’s other, less obvious implications we don’t consider.

    Sometimes we can get caught up in the thrill of a new innovation without thinking the consequences through.

    100_1830

    Take cars for instance. We’re all waiting for the day when we have decent electric cars without emissions, or maybe they’ll be running on hydrogen cells emitting only water. But electric cars will almost certainly be quieter, how will this affect road safety? Will more pedestrians be run over since they can’t hear a car coming?

    And as for cars that emit water vapour – that’s actually THE most efficient global warming agent. Do we know for sure we won’t just make too many clouds?

    Then there’s the internet. We’re already wondering if the ‘connected’ western world isn’t in danger of becoming a culture of lonely, socially inept individuals.  Still, most would agree that getting the Third World connected will be a force for good. Not only will dictatorships find it harder to maintain control when they lose the monopoly on information, in theory it  should be great for people in isolated areas to feel more connected to the rest of the world.

    BUT, I read about some disquieting research on Nigerians who were using the web for the first time. Many actually felt more negative and helpless about their lives. Imagine a blind person who has no concept that there is anything wrong with  them being told that other people can see….

    Many felt poorer than ever after seeing all the riches elsewhere. And the richness of experiences elsewhere made some feel lonelier and more isolated than ever.

    Then there’s getting to exited about what you’ve developed, without considering if anyone actually wants it. Videphones have been possible for a long time, but people simply did not want them. They were just too invasive. It took mobile phones and the feeling of control we have over them before we got comfortable with it.

    I bet someone somwhere is intent on holographic phones. Imagine always being on show, people who phone first thing seeing you in you’re PJ’s, seeing that spot, or your bedhead. Will we be even less inclined to actually go out and see people when we’re ‘with them’ artificially? Will anyone want that?

    Who knows, but this is part of the reason behind me, as a planner, wanting to get more involved in product development, maybe that’s where I can be most useful. Or maybe it’s developing those added value services that help people avoid any negative effects of what we’re selling them. I don’t know.

    But I do know that progress for progress’ sake can be more subtly complicated than we often acknowledge. 

  • So, I was lucky enough to go to the PSFK conference. In return for a free ticket, they asked me to blog about about it, so I am. I reckon you should look at Will and Charles’ reports too.

    Psfk_2

    First off, the venue was great. This is Will’s picture (hope he doesn’t mind), I’ll post my own next time. As you can see, we were under a canopy, with a series of french doors at the side. All that natural light really made a difference.

    What follows is largely a report, I’ll try and keep myself out of it. I’ll post some thoughts on the themes later, but for now one strong opinion is that it was very well organised, ran on schedule and the attendees really helped to make it as much as the speakers.

    By the way, I’m embarrassed to note that I was sat next to Faris for an hour and didn’t even realise until he got up to speak.

    I was annoyed to be late, blame GNER, but I caught the end of Timo Veikkola (Nokia) talking about how shifts in society shape design. Interesting stuff on how culturally we’re in a pretty optimistic mood – we’re worried about the environment and the Middle East, but we think that things will be OK and we’re beginning to act. Doing things for yourself and self expression is becoming important. In answering the questions at the end, he talked about ‘3rd’ life. The idea that we’ll be combining virtual and physical worlds. I wish I’d caught more – it seemed useful for anyone who works on multi national brands (that’s not me though).

    Next up was Regine Debatty (we make money, not art). She blogs about the intersection of art and technology – so as a science geek I’m bound to like this. And I do.

    She starts with biotechnology. We’ve always manipulated the body – from corsets to prosthetic limbs, but we’re moving to a stage where we can manipulate life how we want. But will this make life perfect?

    She talks about the ‘Victimless leather jacket’ – basically a tiny jacket grown from mice cells. Strangely people who see it are disgusted at the thought of wearing one – more than the skin of a dead animal. This says a lot about what we’re ready for and what we’re not.

    There is the probability that stem cells will allow us to grow bits of bodies on ourselves to then sell to other people. Funny to think about class, how rich people will have their bodies grown by the poor.

    Then there’s disembodied cuisine a piece of art where the took live frog cells and grew them into tiny steaks. They served them, they tasted awful, and people reacted strongly against the idea of it too. But in France, in the 70’s, they said they’d never buy pre-packed meat……

    One final thing was the possibility of creating superhumans. This has profound implications for equality. On one hand we have the idea of the ‘natural’ humans who sired them being inferior, but on the other we have all humans being equally perfect. Is this good?

    I really liked her approach. She argued that what’s happening in the labs is mysterious and when we know about it, it’s too late (who has the most imagination by the way, scientists or artists?). She was showing how art can expose and discuss this.

    Then it was Tamara Giltsoff, John Grant and Diana Verde Nieto to debate The Marketing Gap in Green.

    I’ll have to apologise now for not noting who said what:

    Public opinion will be forcing aviation to revise it’s approach – aviation is becoming the new 4×4.

    It’s going mainstream. It’s about money, not philanthropy. Business cannot escape it’s impact – while we decide what to buy, they decide what the choice is in the first place.

    Maybe the opportunity is at the front end – how to help people alter behavior. It’s people NEEDING to be at a meeting at the other end of the world that’s more the issue that how they get there. How can we address this?

    A good point about CSR departments not able to communicate well – and the need for them to work with marketing more.

    Are we talking about ‘marketing green’ or are we talking about sustainable business practice? We need to square selling with sustainability. The way to add value will be letting people look behind a product, at how it was made. That’s what will add value.

    Good point that we’re right at the start of this, like doing websites in 1995. We need to work out what we’re doing – but at least we’re starting. We made it up as we went along with new media – will this be the same?

    A lot of what we need to do is take the pain out of green behavior for people. How can we collaborate with them? Like helping Americans to see that big isn’t better? Or car companies sponsoring car sharing, or sharing school runs.

    Consumers will give their time and attention in return for wellbeing and purpose. We’re not happier having more ‘things’ anyway, purpose can help instead.

    As for agencies, it was suggested that we need a new department, just like when new media took off. We need to avoid thinking of it as special interest, but increasingly the cultural norm. And don’t think you’re an expert, no one is yet.

    So there was a lot to think about. I didn’t expect any answers – it’s too early. And I didn’t get any.

    I’ll stop there for a bit. I think I’ll do this in three chunks. I promise to finish this week.

  • 100_2244

    I’m a bit dazed and confused after a week of sleeping, eating, reading and drinking, but I’m here.

    I’m most confused by learning that Rob Campbell has a pair of pert breasts, but let’s set  that aside for now.

    I need to blog about the PSFK conference and I need to get myself sorted for this too. But I’ve got tons of other stuff just aching to be posted about. Not least working up to more advice, this time about research. And there will be some news on swimming along with some crumbly stuff about, well, this and that.

    Good to be back.

  • I’m supposed to be on holiday, but…

    I had a good day at PSFK yesterday. I’m supposed to be blogging about it (they let me in for free), and I promise to do so when I get back next week.

    For now though, it was well run, the venue was ace, and the speakers were superb. BUT it struck me that the people who were the most interesting were not the ones talking about advertising, or really ‘planning’. The best stuff was from people who are doing something a bit different. Ian Tate was easilly the best for me though. Conclusion of the day? The most interesting stuff isn’t coming from the established big agencies (or clients). Small seems to be better. I’ll report fully in a week or so.

    It was great seeing people though. Will and Charles were there, I met Helen for the first time and we had lunch. She’s a lovely and Comfortably Disorientated in person as she is online. I also had met Beeker for the first time. We both had coffee with Russell. She was very patient with the Star Wars geekery.

    I was very thankful they were there. I always feel out of place at these things. I’m far too shy to go up to people I don’t know and usually end up shrinking into a corner hoping no one will notice me.

    It was a shame I missed the evening – and Lauren. But Friday night was the first night of my holiday. I wanted to get home to Mrs NP.

    That’s really it now. ‘Bye.

  • 100_2527

    I’m getting demob happy. It’s PSKF tomorrow, them I’m off to Greece for a week with Mrs NP. I thought I’d leave you with one more recipe. It’s a goodun. BYEE.

    Top vegetarian one – Indian potato curry. It’s hot, spicy and not for tiny tots.  This serves 4.

    100_2231

    2 tablespoons oil

    1 teaspoon cumin seeds

    1\2 teaspoon turmeric powder

    4 medium potatoes peeled and cubed

    1 teaspoon red chilli powder

    1 teaspoon coriander powder

    1/2 teaspoon garam masala

    1 teaspoon tamarind paste

    2 tomatoes chopped

    1 onion chopped

    I clove garlic chopped (pinch of garlic powder if you’re really pushed)

    1 cup water

    Heat the oil in a heavy bottomed pan. Add the cumin seeds and fry ’till they’re browned. Add the potato cubes and all the dry spices, mix well. Add the chopped tomatoes and water. Cook covered, stirring now and again (uncover first!), on a medium dry heat for about 5 minutes or till the spuds are cooked.

    It’s great on it’s own with a naan, or with rice. You can’t go wrong with boil in the bag rice which takes ten minutes – just start that off first. However, I MUST do something on making proper fluffy rice. You need some specialist ingredients for this, but once you have them in the house, you have them. I promise to do other stuff you’ll use them for.

    Bugger all washing up too.

  • You may have noticed I keep going on about heroes. Now David Beckham ISN’T one, for a host of reasons I shouldn’t need to explain. However, you’ve got to admire the way he’s bounced back again.

    Beck

    Back in 1998, after THAT World Cup sending off, he was probably the most hated person in the country. But in the space of a couple of years, he was national hero, admired as much for his iconic status as his free kicks.

    Today, after the humiliation of losing both his England and Real Madrid shirts, he’s the prime mover in Real’s return to form, playing the football of his life and back on the England squad.

    The man just seems to thrive on proving people wrong. He’s a living example on how best to channel resentment and the burning need to have revenge. Bearing a grudge and spending all your energies trying to get even doesn’t work. You may get to even the score, but you’re left with nothing. However, if you use that searing rage, channel it, to spur you on, to show people how wrong they were, it can motivate you like nothing else. And you’re not left with an empty shell at the end, you’ve done something great.

    Last week was an important week for me. A very hard one, but the end result was winning a pitch that put one or two demons to rest, some quite long term- mostly about proving some people wrong; about me and also some of the people I work with. And you know what? Now I couldn’t give a monkeys about one or two who helped me focus, if you know what I mean. I’m just proud of myself and the some of the people I work with. Pretty good that. Would the same result have come about without their ‘help’? I’m not sure, but they certainly helped me make sure damn sure it did.

  • Dr20evil20mini20me

    Famous Rob Mortimer has been searching for that elusive job for a (too!) long time. But he’d better get a move on since his little brother has started his own blog about branding and stuff. If it wasn’t for the fact that Junior is still a student, Mortimer should be very worried, not to mention the rest of us. As Palpatine said to Anakin, "We shall watch your career with great interest".

    Go take a look and tell him what you think.

  • Thanks to some personal problems, a dose of bad luck and a fair lack of talent, I didn’t get to work in a London agency when I graduated. After a spell as a gymn instructor, my first proper job was media sales at the Independent. And I hated it. There was one saving grace, and that was my ultimate boss, the editor at the time, Andrew Marr. He’s hero 4. to add to Rutherford, Matt Biondi and Agassi.

    Andrew_marr

    Marr is a kind, thoughtful man. He’s also a wonderful writer, but by his own admission, he was a hopeless editor.

    Basically he was in the wrong job. He’s a great, great journalist, but not so good at managing budgets and dealing with business people. When he was fired, it hurt pretty bad, but ever since then he’s gone from strength to strength. He was always one of the few people in the country who was in the political circle; when he went back to political journalism, he was simply doing what he was always meant to do. What followed was a long stint as BBC political correspondent, Radio 4 stalwart, programme maker, book writer (this book on journalism is brilliant, and I’m looking to forward to reading this history of postwar Britain) and nationally treasure.

    Now the keenness of his mind, the grace with which he writes and the wonderful, modest, ordinariness of the man would be enough, but in the end, he gets on the list thanks to the way he overcame a confidence crushing experience to bounce back more successful than ever before. He had the courage to admit he’d failed because he just wasn’t good enough at at it, and started again at something he was born to do.

    This has significant meaning for me, as a former, very average account man who went through something I still find it hard to talk about. But I was never going to be a happy suit, I was supposed to be a planner, not the best in the world, but it’s what I’m meant to do. I’m so happy I had the courage to risk the switch.

    Sometimes failure is the best thing that can happen to you. Not because it teaches you how to get better – sometimes it shows you CAN’T do better, you’re supposed to do something else. People like Marr are living proof that all it takes is courage. Put another way, be who you are.

    And on that note, I’ve got to be inspired by a funny looking bald fellow (someone came up to him and said, "You look just like that Andrew Marr bloke, you poor sod") who’s done alright. If you’ve ever seen me you’ll know what I mean.